Intellectual Property

Protecting what you build — software, data, and trade secrets

Overview

Software companies often underinvest in IP protection until something goes wrong — a competitor copies their product, a key employee leaves with proprietary code, or a vendor claims ownership of work they built. The legal framework for protecting technology IP involves multiple overlapping regimes: copyright protects source code automatically at creation; trade secret law protects confidential information that provides competitive advantage; patents can protect novel software methods and systems; and contracts govern what happens to IP in every business relationship you enter.

One underappreciated IP issue for tech companies is open source compliance. Every tech company uses open source software — the question is whether they're tracking what they use and complying with the license terms. Copyleft licenses (GPL, AGPL especially) impose obligations that can require you to release your own proprietary code if not handled correctly. AGPL is particularly relevant for SaaS companies — its network use provisions mean that even running AGPL software on a server without distributing it may trigger share-alike obligations. An open source audit and policy should be a standard part of any tech company's IP program.

Federal Laws

Federal
Copyright Act
17 U.S.C. §§ 101–1205
The foundational federal law protecting original works of authorship. Copyright attaches automatically upon fixation; registration is not required for protection but is required before suing for infringement and to recover statutory damages.
Last updated May 28, 2026
Federal
Defend Trade Secrets Act
DTSA — 18 U.S.C. §§ 1836–1839
Created a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. Lets companies sue in federal court and seek injunctions, damages, and — in egregious cases — seizure of misappropriated materials.
Last updated May 28, 2026
Federal
Digital Millennium Copyright Act
DMCA — 17 U.S.C. § 512
Establishes safe harbors for online service providers against liability for user-uploaded infringing content, provided they implement notice-and-takedown procedures. Critical for any platform hosting user-generated content.
Last updated May 28, 2026
Federal
Open Source Licensing Frameworks
OSS Licenses
Not a single law but a critical compliance area. Open source licenses create legally binding obligations when you use, modify, or distribute open source software. Key license families: Permissive (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD — few obligations, allow proprietary use); Weak Copyleft (LGPL, MPL — share-alike requirements apply only to the licensed component); Strong Copyleft (GPL, AGPL — require distributing source code of the entire combined work). AGPL is particularly significant for SaaS companies — network use may trigger copyleft obligations even without distributing software. Every tech company needs an open source policy.
Last updated April 4, 2026
Federal
Patent Act
35 U.S.C. §§ 1–390
The federal law governing patents for inventions and designs. Establishes the USPTO, defines patentable subject matter, and creates enforcement rights. Patent eligibility for software remains a contested area post-Alice.
Last updated May 28, 2026

How Jurisdictions Differ

Copyright and patent law are federal — uniform across the US. Trade secret law is largely uniform through the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, though states have their own trade secret laws that may provide additional protections. For international IP, the landscape varies significantly. Patent protection requires country-by-country filings. Copyright protection is generally automatic in Berne Convention countries (most of the world) but enforcement varies dramatically. The EU has specific database protection rights that don't exist in the US. China's IP enforcement environment is distinct and requires specific strategy.

Official Resources

Related Articles

More articles coming soon.

Press Enter to go · ESC to close · Press / to open