Procurement & government contracting

57 laws across all jurisdictions

US Federal (2)
Federal Acquisition Regulation
FAR — 48 CFR Ch. 1
The primary body of rules governing all federal government procurement. Applies to all executive branch agencies. Micro-purchase threshold: $15,000. Simplified acquisition threshold: $350,000. Formal competition required above $350,000.
procurement
Last updated
SBIR/STTR Programs
SBIR/STTR — 15 U.S.C. § 638
Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer programs provide federal R&D funding to small businesses across 11 agencies. Awardees generally retain IP rights under Bayh-Dole principles. A major entry point for tech companies seeking federal contracts.
procurement
Last updated
US States (55)
Alabama Competitive Bid Law
Ala. Code §§ 41-16-1–41-16-82
Two-track system: State Procurement Code governs state agencies, Competitive Bid Law governs local government. Local contracts above $15,000 require sealed competitive bids. State small purchase threshold is $25,000.
procurement
Last updated
Alaska Procurement Code
AS §§ 36.30.005–36.30.990
Follows ABA Model Procurement Code. Geographic realities create unique considerations — transportation costs and remote delivery recognized in regulations. Online vendor registration via AlaskaSE.
procurement
Last updated
Arizona Procurement Code
ARS §§ 41-2501–41-2672
Centrally administered by State Procurement Office. Simplified procedures up to $100,000; formal competitive solicitation above that. Revised in April 2025 for public-private partnerships. Active NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Arkansas Procurement Code
Ark. Code §§ 19-11-201–19-11-268
Modernized 2019, closely follows ABA Model Procurement Code. Mandatory procurement training for all state purchasing employees. Formal competitive bidding above $75,000. Vendor registration via ArkansasBid.com.
procurement
Last updated
Resource
Arkansas Procurement Manual (2024)
procurement
Last updated
California Public Contract Code
Cal. Pub. Cont. Code §§ 1–22355
One of the most complex state procurement systems. Department of General Services is central purchasing authority. Strong small business and DVBE preferences. Active regulations on environmentally preferable purchasing and social equity.
procurement
Last updated
Colorado Procurement Code
CRS §§ 24-101-101–24-114-104
Hybrid centralized/decentralized model. Small purchase threshold $150,000; formal competition above $150,000 for goods/services, $500,000 for IT. Sustainability and social value requirements in procurement.
procurement
Last updated
Connecticut State Purchasing Law
CGS §§ 4a-50–4a-60a
DAS maintains statewide contracts; agencies required to use them when available. Formal competitive bidding above $50,000. Strong small business set-aside and CT supplier preference policies. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Delaware State Procurement Law
Del. Code tit. 29, §§ 6901–6988
Centralized through OMB. Formal competitive bidding above $50,000 for goods, $100,000 for services. Strong in-state preference policy. Participates in several cooperative purchasing programs.
procurement
Last updated
Florida Procurement Law
Fla. Stat. §§ 287.001–287.137
One of the most active state procurement systems. Formal competitive solicitation above $35,000 (Category Two). MyFloridaMarketPlace online procurement required for state agencies. Significant small and minority business programs. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Georgia Procurement Law
GA Code §§ 50-5-50–50-5-81
Centralized State Purchasing Division with statewide contracts. Formal competitive bidding above $100,000. Active small business and veteran-owned business preferences. TeamWorks procurement platform.
procurement
Last updated
Resource
Georgia Procurement Manual (v10, 2022)
procurement
Last updated
Hawaii Public Procurement Code
HRS §§ 103D-101–103D-712
One of the most comprehensive state codes, modeled on ABA Model Procurement Code. Formal competitive bidding above $25,000 for goods, $50,000 for services. Geographic isolation creates unique shipping and vendor availability considerations. Active Hawaii business preferences.
procurement
Last updated
Idaho Code of Purchasing
Idaho Code §§ 67-5701–67-5734
Lean centralized system. Small purchase threshold $50,000; formal competitive bidding above that. Participates in NASPO ValuePoint. Online vendor registration via Idaho VendorNet.
procurement
Last updated
Illinois Procurement Code
30 ILCS 500/1-1–500/99-99
Comprehensive independently developed code, not ABA Model-based. Illinois Procurement Bulletin is official publication for notices. Formal competitive selection above $100,000. Significant small business, veteran-owned, and MBE programs. Robust procurement ethics requirements.
procurement
Last updated
Indiana Purchasing Law
IC §§ 5-22-1-1–5-22-22-10
Tiered small purchase system — simplified procedures below $150,000 for goods, $200,000 for services. Formal competitive solicitation above those thresholds. Automated Vendor Service (AVS) for registration. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Iowa Procurement Law
Iowa Code §§ 8A.311–8A.317
Centralized through DAS. Formal competitive bidding above $50,000. Strong Iowa-based business preference. Emphasizes value analysis and total cost of ownership. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Kansas Procurement and Contracts
KSA §§ 75-3738–75-3744
Formal competitive sealed bidding above $50,000; sealed bids with 3 days notice between $25,000–$50,000. Active cooperative purchasing through NASPO ValuePoint.
procurement
Last updated
Kentucky Model Procurement Code
KRS §§ 45A.010–45A.990
Adopted ABA Model Procurement Code. Small purchase threshold $40,000; formal competitive solicitation above that. Strong ethical requirements and active debarment procedures. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Louisiana Procurement Code
La. R.S. §§ 39:1551–39:1755
Comprehensive code. Formal competitive bidding above $30,000 for goods, $250,000 for services. Strong compliance requirements from past federal oversight. Vendor registration through Louisiana Vendor Portal required.
procurement
Last updated
Maine Purchasing Law
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, §§ 1811–1831
Streamlined system. Formal competitive bidding above $50,000. Preference for Maine products and businesses. Participates in NASPO ValuePoint.
procurement
Last updated
Maryland Procurement Law
Md. Code, State Fin. & Proc. §§ 11-101–17-402
Board of Public Works (Governor, Comptroller, Treasurer) approves major contracts. Formal competitive sealed bidding above $50,000 for goods, $100,000 for services. Active MBE programs with specific participation goals. eMaryland Marketplace Advantage (eMMA) is official portal.
procurement
Last updated
Massachusetts Uniform Procurement Act
MGL ch. 30B
Two frameworks: Ch. 7C for state agencies, Ch. 30B for local governments. Ch. 30B formal competitive bidding above $50,000 for goods/services, $100,000 for construction. COMMBUYS procurement portal. OSD maintains statewide contracts.
procurement
Last updated
Michigan Procurement Law
MCL §§ 18.1201–18.1299
Managed by DTMB. Formal competitive bidding above $50,000 for goods and IT. Active small business and veteran-owned business programs. SIGMA Vendor Self Service portal for registration.
procurement
Last updated
Minnesota Procurement Law
Minn. Stat. §§ 16C.01–16C.35
Well-organized central system through Materials Management Division. Formal competitive bidding above $100,000. Strong small business and targeted group business (TGB) requirements. eSupplier portal for registration. Active NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Mississippi Procurement Law
Miss. Code §§ 31-7-1–31-7-75
Centralized through Office of Purchasing. Formal competitive bidding above $50,000 for goods, $100,000 for services. Strong in-state bidder preference. Mississippi Procurement Portal (PTR system). NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Missouri Purchasing Law
RSMo §§ 34.010–34.380
Formal competitive sealed bidding above $25,000; competitive quotes from 3+ vendors between $5,000–$25,000. Missouri Vendor Services portal. Active cooperative purchasing and NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Montana Procurement Act
MCA §§ 18-4-101–18-4-501
Small purchase threshold $25,000; formal competitive bidding above $50,000. Specific provisions for emergency procurement given rural nature. Montana Vendor Express system for registration.
procurement
Last updated
Nebraska State Purchasing Law
Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 81-145–81-162
Materiel Division maintains statewide contracts. Formal competitive bidding above $50,000. Nebraska Business Registered Enterprise program for in-state vendors. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Nevada State Purchasing Act
NRS ch. 333
Small purchase threshold $100,000; formal competitive solicitation above that. Active small business programs and Nevada-based preferences. NevadaEPro portal. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
New Hampshire Procurement Law
RSA §§ 21-I:11–21-I:22
Streamlined framework. Formal competitive bidding above $25,000. Leader in leveraging cooperative contracts from NASPO ValuePoint.
procurement
Last updated
New Jersey Procurement Law
NJSA §§ 52:34-6.1–52:34-25
Significant centralization through Division of Purchase and Property. Formal competitive bidding above $44,000 (adjusted periodically). Strong set-asides for small, veteran-owned, and MWBE businesses. NJSTART eProcurement system. Local procurement separately governed by Local Public Contracts Law.
procurement
Last updated
New Mexico Procurement Code
NMSA §§ 13-1-1–13-1-199
Comprehensive code. Small purchase threshold $60,000; formal competitive solicitation above that. Strong small business and resident business preferences. Significant requirements around protecting Native American businesses and tribal sovereign interests.
procurement
Last updated
New York Procurement Law
NY State Fin. Law §§ 112, 163
One of the most complex state systems. OGS maintains extensive statewide contracts; agencies required to use them. Formal competitive bidding above $50,000. Highly developed MWBE programs with specific participation requirements. NY eMarketplace platform. Local procurement follows General Municipal Law.
procurement
Last updated
North Carolina Procurement Law
NC GS §§ 143-48–143-64.3
Division of Purchase and Contract manages state procurement. Formal competitive bidding above $90,000 for goods, $300,000 for services. Significant NC HUB (Historically Underutilized Business) requirements. Interactive Purchasing System (IPS) for opportunities.
procurement
Last updated
North Dakota Procurement Law
NDCC §§ 54-44.4-01–54-44.4-14
Streamlined system. Small purchase threshold $25,000; formal competitive bidding above $50,000. Strong preference for ND-based businesses. ND Buylines system for registration. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Ohio Procurement Law
ORC §§ 125.01–125.21
One of the larger and more sophisticated state systems. State Term Schedule covers extensive pre-competed contracts. Formal competitive bidding above $50,000 for goods, $25,000 for services. Strong small and minority business programs. Ohio Vendor Services portal.
procurement
Last updated
Oklahoma Central Purchasing Act
Okla. Stat. tit. 74, §§ 85.1–85.45r
Small purchase threshold $50,000; formal competitive sealed bidding above that. Active small business and disadvantaged business programs. iSupplier portal for vendor registration. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Oregon Public Contracting Code
ORS §§ 279A.005–279C.870
Sophisticated three-chapter framework: 279A (general/ethics), 279B (goods/services), 279C (public improvements). Formal competitive sealed bidding above $150,000. Significant small business and MWBE programs. ORPIN for vendor registration.
procurement
Last updated
Pennsylvania Procurement Code
Pa. C.S. tit. 62, §§ 101–4604
Comprehensive code with strong transparency requirements. Formal competitive sealed bidding above $10,500 for commodities, $35,700 for services (indexed). Significant small diverse business (SDB) participation requirements. PA eMarketplace. Sunset Act creates periodic contract review requirements.
procurement
Last updated
Rhode Island State Purchases Law
RIGL §§ 37-2-1–37-2-87
Small purchase threshold $10,000; formal competitive bidding above $50,000. Strong RI-based business preferences. RI Contract Portal for opportunities. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
South Carolina Consolidated Procurement Code
SC Code §§ 11-35-10–11-35-5270
Applies to both state and local government — one of the more unified frameworks. Small purchase threshold $50,000; formal competitive solicitation above that. Robust small and minority business programs. SC Statewide Procurement System.
procurement
Last updated
South Dakota Procurement Management Law
SDCL §§ 5-18A-1–5-18A-47
Streamlined system. Small purchase threshold $25,000; formal competitive sealed bidding above $50,000. In-state preference policies. Intentionally simpler framework reflecting limited-government approach. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Tennessee Procurement Law
TCA §§ 12-3-101–12-3-1209
Central Procurement Office manages state purchasing. Formal competitive sealed bidding above $50,000. Active small business, veteran-owned, and MBE programs. Edison procurement system. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Texas Contracting and Delivery Procedures for Construction Projects
Tex. Gov. Code §§ 2269.001–2269.413
Authorizes alternative construction delivery methods for governmental entities including competitive sealed proposals, construction manager-at-risk (CMAR), design-build, and job order contracting. Sets procedures, qualification requirements, and evaluation criteria for each method.
procurement
Last updated
Texas Municipal Purchasing and Contracting Authority
Tex. Local Gov. Code §§ 252.001–252.049
The primary statute governing competitive purchasing by Texas municipalities. Requires competitive sealed bidding or proposals for expenditures over $50,000, sets exemptions, establishes best value criteria, and governs change orders and contract bonds.
procurement
Last updated
Texas Professional and Consulting Services Procurement Act
Tex. Gov. Code §§ 2254.001–2254.004
Requires qualifications-based selection for architects, engineers, and surveyors — price cannot be a factor until after the most qualified firm is selected. Also governs consulting services contracts with state agencies.
procurement
Last updated
Texas Purchasing and Contracting Authority of Municipalities and Counties
Tex. Local Gov. Code §§ 271.001–271.083
Covers cooperative purchasing programs, electronic bidding, performance contracts, design-build for civil works, and the right to audit contractors. Subchapter D authorizes participation in cooperative purchasing programs like BuyBoard and TIPS.
procurement
Last updated
Utah Procurement Code
Utah Code §§ 63G-6a-101–63G-6a-2406
Comprehensive rewrite in 2012. Small purchase threshold $50,000; formal competitive solicitation above that. Strong Utah business preferences. JAGGAER procurement platform (UtahInterchange). NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Vermont Purchasing Law
Vt. Stat. tit. 29, §§ 901–922
Streamlined system. Formal competitive bidding above $25,000. Strong VT-based business preferences. Actively leverages cooperative purchasing given limited procurement staff.
procurement
Last updated
Virginia Public Procurement Act
Va. Code §§ 2.2-4300–2.2-4384
One of the more detailed frameworks. Formal competitive sealed bidding above $100,000. Strong small, women-owned, and minority business programs. eVA electronic procurement system for state and many local agencies.
procurement
Last updated
Washington State Procurement Law
RCW §§ 39.26.005–39.26.901
Separate frameworks for state (RCW 39.26) and local (RCW 39.04) agencies. Formal competitive solicitation above $150,000. Strong small and minority business programs. WA Procurement Portal for registration.
procurement
Last updated
West Virginia Purchasing Law
WV Code §§ 5A-3-1–5A-3-62
Small purchase threshold $25,000; formal competitive sealed bidding above $50,000. In-state preference policies. WV Vendor Self Service portal. NASPO ValuePoint participant.
procurement
Last updated
Wisconsin Purchasing Law
Wis. Stat. §§ 16.70–16.82
Statewide contracts available to agencies and municipalities. Formal competitive bidding above $50,000. Active WI-based and historically underutilized business programs. VendorNet system for registration. NASPO ValuePoint and Midwestern Higher Ed Compact participant.
procurement
Last updated
Wyoming State Procurement Law
Wyo. Stat. §§ 9-2-1016–9-2-1038
Lean system. Formal competitive sealed bidding above $75,000. Actively leverages NASPO ValuePoint — valuable given small procurement staff. In-state preference policies.
procurement
Last updated

Press Enter to go · ESC to close · Press / to open